<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/platform.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar/5358931?origin\x3dhttp://yellow_pages.blogspot.com', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

 

Yellow Pages Fri Apr 11 2025 06:27:42 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time).

 

Freedom quote for 4/11/2025
Heresy is only another word for freedom of thought.
(Graham Greene)

Friday, March 31, 2006

Daily Planet News now has over 200 newsfeeds


When DPN had 150+ newsfeeds all on one page it was probably the biggest one-stop news source to be found. I've added a lot more, and now there are 200+ newsfeeds, still with the auto-refresh feature so that if you keep the page open and minimized you get the latest updates from those 200 sources every 15 minutes. I've added a daily cartoon too, just as an experiment.

I don't mean you get 200 headlines every 15 minutes.

I mean you get more than 600 headlines from more than 200 worldwide sources, refreshing four times an hour! Check it out and for variety of information compare it with CNN, Google News, Yahoo! News, NY Times, your local paper or Fox News, etc etc. Let me know what you think.

Why get news from one corporation, or even five or ten? I suggest you try Daily Planet News and I feel pretty confident you'll find it worth bookmarking. I myself check in several times a day just to see what's going on in the world. Get the news before TV, radio and printed newspapers. If you like it, thank you for spreading the word.

Tagged:

Thursday, March 30, 2006

Australians top the world when it comes to crime

"AUSTRALIANS are more likely than those in any other developed country to find themselves the victim of a serious crime, including that of a sexual nature, an international report has found.

"The OECD, in its annual report comparing the group's members on a range of issues, found Australia had the highest rate of victimisation. Between 1990 and the time of the study, the number of victims of crime had increased in Australia, it said.

"Of the OECD's member nations, Australia had the highest proportion of victims of assaults, threats and crimes of a sexual nature, the second highest proportion of burglaries, and high rates of robberies, car thefts and thefts from cars. New Zealand had the second highest proportion of victims.

"The US, which recorded a fall in victimisation rates, was mid-range.

"The international comparisons were better for Australia when it came to quality of life, with low rates of infant mortality. Its rates of life expectancy were among the highest ..."
Sydney Morning Herald

Tagged: ,

Hear Robert Fisk lecture recorded in Sydney

"He is controversial, outspoken and always draws a crowd. Journalist Robert Fisk has spent over 30 years in the Middle East. He's covered the Lebanese civil war, the Iranian Revolution, Iran-Iraq wars, the Gulf Wars, Afghanistan and the current conflict in Iraq. He says he's met Osama Bin Laden three times. Fisk is more determined than ever to prosecute a case against the injustices of the west against the Arab and Muslim world. Agree with him or not, his presentations are suffused with passionate belief in change for the better. This talk was recorded recently in Sydney, as part of the Sydney Ideas 2006 public lecture series organised by the University of Sydney."
Listen in Real Media (great lecture)

Source

Tuesday, March 28, 2006

The mission was indeed accomplished

Highly recommended
By Greg Palast

"Get off it. All the carping, belly-aching and complaining about George Bush's incompetence in Iraq, from both the Left and now the Right, is just dead wrong.

"On the third anniversary of the tanks rolling over Iraq's border, most of the 59 million Homer Simpsons who voted for Bush are beginning to doubt if his mission was accomplished.

"But don't kid yourself -- Bush and his co-conspirator, Dick Cheney, accomplished exactly what they set out to do. In case you've forgotten what their real mission was, let me remind you of White House spokesman Ari Fleisher's original announcement, three years ago, launching of what he called,

Operation

Iraqi

Liberation.
"O.I.L. How droll of them, how cute. Then, Karl Rove made the giggling boys in the White House change it to 'OIF' -- Operation Iraqi Freedom. But the 101st Airborne wasn't sent to Basra to get its hands on Iraq's OIF.

"'It's about oil,' Robert Ebel told me. Who is Ebel? Formerly the CIA's top oil analyst, he was sent by the Pentagon, about a month before the invasion, to a secret confab in London with Saddam's former oil minister to finalize the plans for "liberating" Iraq's oil industry. In London, Bush's emissary Ebel also instructed Ibrahim Bahr al-Ulum, the man the Pentagon would choose as post-OIF oil minister for Iraq, on the correct method of disposing Iraq's crude.

"And what did the USA want Iraq to do with Iraq's oil? The answer will surprise many of you: and it is uglier, more twisted, devilish and devious than anything imagined by the most conspiracy-addicted blogger. The answer can be found in a 323-page plan for Iraq's oil secretly drafted by the State Department. Our team got a hold of a copy; how, doesn't matter. The key thing is what's inside this thick Bush diktat: a directive to Iraqis to maintain a state oil company that will "enhance its relationship with OPEC."

"Enhance its relationship with OPEC??? How strange: the government of the United States ordering Iraq to support the very OPEC oil cartel which is strangling our nation with outrageously high prices for crude.

"Specifically, the system ordered up by the Bush cabal would keep a lid on Iraq's oil production -- limiting Iraq's oil pumping to the tight quota set by Saudi Arabia and the OPEC cartel.

"There you have it. Yes, Bush went in for the oil -- not to get more of Iraq's oil, but to prevent Iraq producing too much of it ..."
GregPalast.com

[See also The Real Reasons for the Upcoming War with Iraq which we published in the Scriptorium in January, 2003.]

Tagged: , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 26, 2006

West Papua is rising

Click for more global actions one person can take

West Papuan students have begun an uprising which is being violently suppressed by the Indonesian police and military. Indonesian Police in Jayapura West Papua are meting out arbitrary vengeance after violent clashes with student demonstrators. Students were protesting for the closure of the New Orleans based Freeport-McMoRan Grasberg copper and gold mine, one of the largest mines in the world. "We want Freeport to close because it has not given any benefits to the people of Papua," one protestor told the ABC. "In fact, it's made them suffer."

Rally and march on April 2 to Free West Papua, and to free the 43 West Papuan refugees held on Christmas Island.

"Enough is enough!" - cries from West PapuaThe Secret War Against The Defenceless People Of West Papua - John Pilger

freewestpapua.com IMC Jakarta (Indonesian)

West Papua Independence Day in the Book of Days

Tagged: , , , ,

The Attack on the Press in Iraq

"It was one of the last questions yesterday at another of the town hall meetings that President Bush has been filling his schedule with lately -- this one in West Virginia. A woman stood up and first let Bush know that, like almost every other questioner before her, she too had the leader of the free world in her prayers: "I want to let you know that every service at our church you are, by name, lifted up in prayer, and you and your staff and all of our leaders."

"Then she asked, 'from the bottom of [her] heart,' for the president to help her understand why 'it seems that our major media networks don't want to portray the good. They just want to focus on another car bomb, or they just want to focus on some more bloodshed, or they just want to focus on how they don't agree with you and what you're doing, when they don't even probably know how you're doing what you're doing anyway.'

"And the crowd went wild. Her accusation-posed-as-question, at least among the hundreds in the audience who regularly pray for Bush, was met with a standing ovation.

"If Karl Rove were lurking in the wings, he probably made this mental note to himself: 'Keep attacking.'

"Given the stream of disparaging comments about the press over the past few days -- from the president, from the vice president, from Donald Rumsfeld -- this seems to have become strategy.

"The attack, as far as we can tell, has two discernable forms. Let's hold them up to the light for a moment ..."
Media Channel

[There really are people who support Dubya? How extraordinary!]

Saturday, March 25, 2006

What’s become of Americans?

By Paul Craig Roberts

"Imagine knocking on America’s door and being told, 'Americans don’t live here any longer. They have gone away.'

"But isn’t that what we are hearing, that Americans have gone away? Alan Shore told us so on ABC’s Boston Legal on March 14:

"When the weapons of mass destruction thing turned out not to be true, I expected the American people to rise up. They didn't.

"Then, when the Abu Ghraib torture thing surfaced and it was revealed that our government participated in rendition, a practice where we kidnap people and turn them over to régimes who specialize in torture, I was sure then the American people would be heard from. We stood mute.

"Then came the news that we jailed thousands of so-called terrorist suspects, locked them up without the right to a trial or even the right to confront their accusers. Certainly, we would never stand for that. We did.

"And now, it's been discovered the executive branch has been conducting massive, illegal, domestic surveillance on its own citizens. You and me. And I at least consoled myself that finally, finally the American people will have had enough. Evidently, we haven't.

"In fact, if the people of this country have spoken, the message is we're okay with it all. Torture, warrantless search and seizure, illegal wiretappings, prison without a fair trial or any trial, war on false pretenses. We, as a citizenry, are apparently not offended.

"There are no demonstrations on college campuses. In fact, there's no clear indication that young people even seem to notice ...

"The Secret Service can now declare free speech zones to contain, control and, in effect, criminalize protest. Stop for a second and try to fathom that. At a presidential rally, parade or appearance, if you have on a supportive t-shirt, you can be there. If you’re wearing or carrying something in protest, you can be removed.

"This! In the United States of America.

"Readers tell me that Americans don’t live here any more ..."
InformationClearingHouse

Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Friday, March 24, 2006

Women in Africa most affected by HIV/AIDS

Click for more global actions one person can take
Need own UN agency to address needs, UN Special Envoy Lewis says

"HIV/AIDS disproportionately affects women and girls in Africa, necessitating a new U.N. agency to focus specifically on women and HIV/AIDS, U.N. Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa Stephen Lewis on Friday said at a news conference, Reuters Canada reports. Lewis, who had just returned from a trip to Lesotho and Swaziland, said a recent government study shows that 56% of pregnant women in Swaziland between ages 25 and 29 are living with HIV/AIDS and that about 30% of 15- to 17-year-old girls in Lesotho are living with the disease. An estimated 43% of HIV-positive people ages 15 to 49 in Lesotho are men, and about 57% are women, Reuters Canada reports. The rate of HIV-positive women in Swaziland is 'the highest prevalence I have ever encountered in the last five years,' Lewis said. He added, 'What has happened to women is such a gross and palpable violation of human rights that the funding must be found,' saying that a well-funded and influential agency targeting women would reduce the HIV prevalence within the group."
Medical News Today

Stephen Lewis at Wikipedia :: AIDS in Africa news at Daily Planet News :: Action

Hear Stephen Lewis interviewed on this topic

HIV/AIDS in Africa: The Race Against Time

Real Media :: Windows Media :: Download MP3 :: Podcast

Tagged: ,

Wednesday, March 22, 2006

$360 billion so far spent on Iraq


"... The weapons of mass destruction the administration said Saddam Hussein possessed before the war have never been found -- and many experts believe never existed. White House officials hammered then-chief economic adviser Lawrence B. Lindsey for claiming the war could cost as little as $100 billion, saying the estimate was too high. The actual tally is fast approaching four times that amount, according to the Congressional Research Service, which estimates a $360 billion price tag to date ..."
Washington Post: Old Forecasts Come Back to Haunt Bush

Tagged: , , , , , ,

Thursday, March 16, 2006

Aussie protesters interrupt speech by Rice

"Protesters twice interrupted a speech by US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Thursday after anti-war activists clashed with police outside a Sydney venue.

"Five protesters were charged when about 40 anti-war demonstrators rallied outside Sydney's Conservatorium of Music, which was patrolled by police on horseback and members of the dog squad.

"Inside, Dr Rice addressed students from several Australian universities and later answered their questions.

Just minutes into her address, a young man and woman were removed by security staff for repeatedly interjecting.

"Iraqi blood is on your hands," the protesters said.

The Age

Al Gore recent speech

West Palm Beach, Florida
March 12, 2006

Thank you, thank you, thank you. Thank you very much. It’s great to be back. It’s great to be back with you and it’s great to feel the enthusiasm that you have.

(To a call from the audience that he should have been President) I was -- President of the Senate.

I want to thank your wonderful state party chair Karen Thurman who is a great public servant and a great party chair and a great friend to me. I just want to begin by acknowledging the expertise and dedication that Karen and Luis Navarro, your Executive Director, have brought to this state party. It is really a great sight to behold.

To all of the candidates and public officials who have spoken and who are joining me on stage, I want to pay my respects, to say to Senator Rod Smith and my friend Congressman Jim Davis, whichever one of you guys gets the nomination, we’re going to make you the next Governor of the State of Florida.

State Senator Skip Campbell is going to be a great Attorney General for the state of Florida and let’s make sure that happens. To the state representatives here, State Senator Ron Klein will be the next member of Congress from the 22nd Congressional District, and Tim Mahoney from the 16th Congressional District. I want to say a special word of thanks to Mayor Lois Frankel. I’ll tell you, if you’re in a knock-down, drag-out, you want Lois Frankel on your side. She is great and has done great work for so long. Palm Beach County Chair Wahid Mahmood, thank you for your friendship and leadership, and to the next Agriculture Commissioner, Eric Copeland, good luck to you, my friend.

I am Al Gore, I am a recovering politician, and I’m on about step nine now. But I have to tell you, feeling your enthusiasm and seeing the outstanding candidates that you are putting forward is very exciting for me and I want to encourage them.

I want to begin by saying that over the last two days I have had a wonderful experience traveling here in Florida with a truly outstanding public servant, your senator, Bill Nelson. And so, even though he’s not here today -- I’ve been with him -- he’s at another event that was already scheduled -- I’ve been with him at quite a few events over the last two days. I want to urge you not to take anything for granted. Sometimes as Democrats we can feel the prospects of victory and success. Sometimes there is a temptation to say, oh well, we’ll relax a little bit. You know that’s a deadly error and you’re not going to make that mistake, but I want to give you a couple of reasons to redouble your efforts.

The United States of America was born in 1789 of a revolutionary idea that we the people are the best stewards of our destiny and that self-government could prosper on this earth. And our founders designed the most brilliantly written political document in all of human history in our Constitution.

The people, of course, made it much better -- they wouldn’t ratify it until they sent them back into convention and said, add the Bill of Rights. We want freedom of the press, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure and all of the other guarantees in the Bill of Rights.

Our founders were probably the most literate generation in all of history and they were keen students of human nature. And they understood quite well that what they were doing was a sharp break from all of the history that preceded America. They had studied what happened in ancient Athens. They knew the story of the Roman republic and how it fell when a returning general seized power. They knew that democracy was possible, but they know that it was fragile. And they knew that the greatest threat to the survival of democracy lay deep within human nature.

And thus they designed a framework that was intended to avoid the accumulation of too much power in the hands of any one person or any one small group of people, who, they understood, would inevitably, because of human nature, have their own interests that could get out of proportion in their minds compared to the public interests and the high principles on which they always wanted this great country to be based.

And so they established three branches of government and made them independent one from the others. And set checks and balances in place so that whenever one branch or one small group got too big for it’s britches or too much power for what was healthy, the other branches would keep them in place. And in writing that document it was not an accident that they wrote Article I about the Congress, the House, and the United States Senate. They believed that it was the most likely safeguard to prevent abuses from the President and the Executive Branch because that was what they most feared given the experiences they had with King George of England. And so the willingness and ability of members of Congress to live up to their oaths of office to protect and defend the Constitution is intimately related to the most important safeguard of what America is all about.

In the state of Texas there are no statewide Democratic officials. In the state of Florida there is one. And he is an independent voice. And he calls them as he sees them. And one of the most important questions that is at stake in the Senate race is whether or not Florida wants a rubber stamp, another rubber stamp, to go along with whatever the Executive Branch wants, or whether you recognize and understand that especially in this moment in our history it is particularly important to have a senator who is independent, who will hold them accountable and say, this is right, that’s wrong, and hold their feet to the fire.

Let me give you an example. I’m an environmentalist. I’m proud that Senator Bill Nelson has fought to protect the coastline of Florida against off-shore drilling. The Secretary of the Interior, with whom Senator Nelson has so frequently crossed swords, you may have noticed or you may not have, resigned on Friday night. You know, reading tea leaves is something you learn a little bit about if you’re up there long enough. Tipper and I live in Nashville, Tennessee, but I still read a few tea leaves. And when a cabinet official exits after the news deadlines on a Friday evening, it’s hard to know what it means. But it doesn’t mean that it’s a triumphal exit. It means they don’t want it to be noticed too much because that’s what Friday nights are for in the political world. You know how it goes. But I want you to give full credit to Bill Nelson for backing her down and protecting the coastline in Florida.

Now I want to say something here that in my opinion goes beyond any of the specific issues. There are so many of them, but they all have a few things in common. How many times have we listened to the current administration and their supporters in the Congress and in the state offices here in Florida that are Republican and after a few years, suddenly everyone wakes up and says, what they’ve been telling us has been completely wrong. I’m not calling it a lie. I’m not, I’m not. I’m just saying that, you know, we got the impression, we got what turned out to be a false impression that Saddam Hussein had a lot to do with attacking our country on September 11th. We got the impression that he was about to build an atomic bomb with uranium from Africa and give it to his buddy Osama Bin Laden. We got the impression that our troops would be welcomed with flowers and that they would speedily go about the task of putting a democracy in place and that we wouldn’t need many troops because it would be a cakewalk. All those impressions turned out to be false. Now I don’t know how that happened, but we’re paying a price and unfortunately it’s a heavy price.

In my religious tradition there is a saying in the Bible that I read -- “Where there is no vision, the people perish.” There were warnings from the general in charge of the Army, General Eric Shinseki -- we don’t have enough troops to do this, it’s dangerous to do it with so few and with the plan that’s not thought out. And they cashiered him and silenced him. And the others got the message. His warning was ignored.

There was a warning of 9-11 -- Osama Bin Laden was determined to attack within the United States of America. In eight years in the White House President Clinton and I a few times got a direct and really immediate statement like that in one of those daily briefings and every time, as you would want and expect, we had a fire drill, brought everybody in. What else do we know about this? What have we done to prepare for this? What else could we do? Are we certain of the sources? Get us more information on that. We want to know everything about this and we want to make sure our country is prepared. In August of 2001, such a clear warning was given, and nothing, nothing, happened. Where there is no vision, the people perish.

Four Augusts later, as Hurricane Katrina was bearing down on the city of New Orleans, having crossed South Florida and then gaining strength from the warmer waters of the gulf, there were warnings that the levees were in danger. No questions were asked. No evacuation plan was put in place. The buses were left to be flooded along with the rest of the city. Where there is no vision, the people perish.

A special committee of 11 Republicans, all Republicans, did a study of how that could have happened. Let me tell you what they said, and this is an exact quote. “In the White House,” they said, “there was a blinding lack of situational awareness.” Where there is a blinding lack of situational awareness, the people perish.

What is going on there now? There are still refrigerators in front yards, and there are still bodies under rubble not yet recovered. The levees have not yet been repaired. There were warnings.

When the important legislation to help senior citizens pay for their prescription drugs was being presented to the Congress, inside the bureaucracy the experts with the knowledge who had calculated the numbers were saying, this won’t work. The numbers are all wrong. And Democrats in the Congress said, we want those numbers, we want the testimony. We want to know what the truth is. And the truth was locked from the Congress. The testimony was not allowed. The awareness was not there. And then, of course, the legislation turned out to be catastrophically flawed.

There were warnings that the economic plan would create giant deficits and put our economic future at risk. The Secretary of the Treasury, Paul O’Neill, came in at the beginning of that plan for his first meeting in the Oval Office and then wrote in his memoirs that the meeting lasted an hour and that there was not one single question. If you were a member of the cabinet or shared the responsibility for charting the economic destiny of our country, would you be curious about the plan you were about to enact? Where there is no vision, the people perish.

Finally, there are warnings now, and have been for many years, that the rising temperatures of our world, caused by global warming pollution, are raising the temperature of the oceans as well. Warnings that the hotter ocean water makes hurricanes stronger, increasing their destructive power. Are those warnings being ignored?

I think it’s a lot more complicated. What I’m getting at is that all of these things have a common thread running through them. When our country began with those checks and balances, our founders wanted us to make the principles of democracy live and breathe in our hearts and in our daily lives by talking with one another about the facts as best we could establish them, the best evidence we could find, reason together and use the rule of reason to make the best decisions that we could. Put partisanship aside as much as possible. Of course there’s always going to be partisanship. But let’s join together as Americans and try to do what is right for our country. And how do we determine what’s right? By looking at the facts and by being honest with one another. And being truthful with one another. If it offends some big company or some special interest, so be it. Let’s do what’s right for the people.

How many of you here have had the feeling in the last few years, that something has gone badly wrong with America? How many of you here have had the feeling that there’s something a little strange about the way decisions have been made? How many of you have had the feeling that the way it’s been done is just kind of contrary to what the United States of America is all about?

General George Washington at Valley Forge, in the darkest hours of our revolution, during a time when a war correspondent by the name of Thomas Paine wrote, “these are the times that try men’s souls,” led an army, rag-tag as it was, trying to survive that cold winter and emerge in the spring with some chance of victory to bring forth a new nation based on liberty and the principles of justice that mark America’s role in the world. And during that cold winter, some British soldiers were captured, and while they were held, two of Washington’s lieutenants came and said, “you know, our soldiers, when they were captured by the British or their allies the Hessians, have been tortured terribly. Some of the fellows want to return the favor and torture these captives.”

And George Washington said no -- no matter that in all prior history that has been commonplace, we are different. What made us different, he said, was that we respect the dignity of individuals, because the dignity of the individual is what our system is based on. That’s where the right of free speech and free worship goes, and if the whole American system was going to work we had to be true to ourselves and to the basic principles of Americans. So he said no. Every president from George Washington all the way through until now honored that principle. In every war there have been excesses and exceptions that come out of the extremes of combat and war but never previously has it been official U.S. policy to depart from that respect that we should not torture people.

My friends, I truly believe, not everybody here may agree with this, but I genuinely believe that American democracy faces a time of challenge and trial right now more serious than any we have ever faced. The current White House, backed by the Republican Congress, now asserts that the government can eavesdrop on anybody’s conversation here that they want to, that they can go into your homes, they call it “sneak-and-peak,” without a warrant. They assert that this White House, on the say-so of one person, the President, can lock up any American citizen for the rest of his or her life, if the Executive Branch determines that’s what they want to do, without allowing them to see a lawyer or even informing their family. This sounds so strange, doesn’t it? It’s so contrary to the constitution and to our way of life and to our principles.

But let me close by telling you that the good news is that America is waking up to their game. America is catching on to what they are all about. Even many Republicans are saying enough is enough.

There is another common thread and it runs among all of these candidates and the others that you are offering up here in Florida, and it is that all of them are supportive of what America really is all about and would oppose what this White House and this Congress is trying to do.

We are a partisan gathering. We have an opportunity in the political system to fight for independent voices that will make our checks and balances work and help to restore the good health of America’s democracy. But my friends, much more is required. Beyond partisanship, even as we fight through this election season, we have to reach out to our Republican and independent friends and form a bond, insofar that it is possible to do so, and make the powerful point that we the people of these United States of America, are going to stand up for what America is all about and take our country back.

God bless you, and let’s start right here in Palm Beach county. Thank you.

Florida Dems

Salon publishes big Abu Ghraib archive


"Salon has published 279 photographs, 19 videos, and reports about the [USA] Army's internal investigation into detainee abuse inside Abu Ghraib -- along with background on how the publication obtained these materials. To date none of the officers identified as having been involved in the human rights scandal have been brought to justice in a court of law."

Link

Lid dip to Chris Keeley

Tagged: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 15, 2006

Grounds for impeachment

"George W. Bush and his Administration have been so brazen in violating the law and asserting monarchical powers that we, as American citizens, must use the tool that the Constitution provides to reassert our rights, to reset the system of checks and balances, and to reestablish our democracy. That tool is impeachment.

"Article II, Section 4, states: 'The President, Vice President, and all civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.'

"Notice that the Vice President is specifically mentioned. So while we’re advocating the impeachment of George W. Bush, let’s not stop there. Impeach Dick Cheney, too. For Cheney has been in on every illegal act that Bush has committed.

"And notice the phrase 'other high crimes and misdemeanors.' At the Constitutional Convention, the drafters had originally restricted impeachment to 'treason' and 'bribery.' But George Mason, one of the influential delegates, found those terms insufficient, according to Articles of Impeachment Against George W. Bush, a new and highly informative book by the Center for Constitutional Rights. Those terms 'will not reach many great and dangerous offenses,' Mason said, including 'attempts to subvert the Constitution.' After some wrangling over wording, the founders agreed to James Madison’s phrase 'high crimes and misdemeanors.'

"And that is exactly what George W. Bush has been committing: He’s been subverting our Constitution, and he has repeatedly violated his oath of office to 'faithfully execute' his duties and to 'preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States.'

"He has done so in four key areas: in the Iraq War, in detentions here at home and abroad, in the torture scandal, and in the NSA warrantless spying program.

"First, Iraq. Bush’s invasion was a war of aggression, prohibited by the U.N. Charter. Article 2 of that Charter says, 'All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.' Article 51 provides an exception for 'self-defense' but only 'if an armed attack' has already occurred against that state.

"Saddam Hussein had not attacked the United States.

"International law also provides an exception for imminence: if you’re just about to be attacked.

"Saddam Hussein was not about to attack the United States.

By waging this aggressive war, Bush was violating the U.N. Charter, as Kofi Annan himself has acknowledged.

"And by violating the U.N. Charter, Bush was violating Article VI of the Constitution, which says that treaties are 'the supreme law of the land.'

"But even beyond this, the way that Bush bamboozled the country into war is itself an impeachable offense. There can hardly be a more grave act imaginable than to dupe a democracy into going to war, but that is what Bush has done, as the Downing Street Memo clearly indicates ..."
The Progressive

Impeachment Talk Reaches the Mainstream
"The groundswell for President Bush's impeachment is growing, and last week the establishment media finally took notice.

"The Wall Street Journal ran a story analyzing how a planned impeachment of President Bush will play out as an 'election issue,' including a helpful pie chart showing 51 percent of Americans support Congress in considering Bush's impeachment if he 'didn't tell the truth about the reasons for the Iraq war.'

"The Washington Post published a commentary acknowledging that support for impeachment is now 'reaching beyond the usual suspects,' and the Associated Press covered the spike in pro-impeachment resolutions from local officials across the country. Resolutions recently passed in Vermont and California, and this weekend Democratic Party officials in Michigan voted to urge local officials to pass another. Meanwhile, 14 Democratic candidates for Congress have announced their support for impeachment ..."
AlterNet

Fascism Anyone?

Tagged: , , ,

China boosts military spending 14.7 per cent


"China will boost its military spending 14.7 pct to about 35.1 bln usd this year, parliament spokesman Jiang Enzhu said.

"Jiang also said 'moderate' spending increases in recent years were aimed at strengthening China's defensive capabilities, but he repeated a warning that Taiwan should not move towards independence."
Forbes

Military budget of the People's Republic of China

Tagged: , , , ,

Monday, March 13, 2006

Former top judge says US risks edging near to dictatorship

"Sandra Day O'Connor, a Republican-appointed judge who retired last month after 24 years on the supreme court, has said the US is in danger of edging towards dictatorship if the party's rightwingers continue to attack the judiciary."
The Guardian

US invasion - 250,000 dead civilians in Iraq


By John Stokes

New studies make the Bush administration's "liberation" argument for a 'pre-emptive' war against Iraq seem questionable.

The invasion of Iraq in March 2003 by U.S.-led coalition forces has been responsible for the death of at least 150,000 civilians (not including certain of Iraq), reveals a compilitation of scientific studies and corroborated eyewitness testimonies.

The majority of these deaths, which are in addition those normally expected from natural causes, illness and accidents, have been among women and children, documents a well-researched study, that had been released by The Lancet Medical Journal.

The report in the British journal is based on the work of teams from the Johns Hopkins University and Columbia University in the U.S., and the Al-Mustansiriya University in Baghdad.

A similar methodology was used in the late 1990's to calculate the number of deaths from the war in Kosovo, put at 10,000.

The information was obtained as Iraqi interviewers surveyed 808 families, consisting of 7,868 people, in 33 different "clusters" or neighbourhoods spread across the country.

In each case, they asked how many births and deaths there had been in the home since January 2002.

That information was then compared with the death rates in each neighbourhood in the 15 months before the invasion that toppled president Saddam Hussein, adjusted for the different time frames, and extrapolated to cover the entire 24.4 million population of Iraq.

The most common cause of death is as a direct result of a worsening 'culture of violence', mostly caused by indiscriminate U.S. co-ordinated air strikes, and related military interventions, reveals the study of almost 1000 households scattered across Iraq. And the risk of violent death just after the invasion was 58 times greater than before the war. The overall risk of death was 1.5 times more after the invasion than before.

The on-going American Occupation has also created worsened civil strife as well as mass environmental destructions and related public health problems that is associated with American bomb-related released radioactive and other life-threatening pollutions. The American Occupation has also prevailed over the neglect to the repairing of vital public services-related infrastructure, which include U.S.-led destructions of water systems.

The figure of 100,000 had been based on somewhat "conservative assumptions", notes Les Roberts at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, U.S., who led the study.

That estimate excludes Falluja, a hotspot for violence. If the data from this town is included, the compiled studies point to about 250,000 excess deaths since the outbreak of the U.S.-led war.

Many Americans have complained that more than $200 billion U.S. tax dollars have been diverted from vitally needed public services in the United States, into apparently reckless activities. These activities are resulting in inflicted mass-casualities against totally innocent civilians, which have worsened conditions for political extremism, and ensuing "terrorism".

It is well documented that such activities are being viewed by many Iraqis, and other peoples internationally, to undermine a popular feeling of international security in general. Indeed, polls suggest that Americans felt much more secure under the former political leadership of U.S. President Bill Clinton, as compared to the militaristic strategies which are being pursued by the George W. Bush administration.

The Canadian

Fair Use Statement

In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 of US Copyright Law, this attributed work is provided by Yellow Pages on a non-profit basis to facilitate understanding, research, education, and the advancement of human rights and social justice.

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

George W Bush, terrorist in the White House

Good page of links re George W Bush and his administration's war crimes.

Tagged: , , ,

Important interview with Ralph Schoenman on Iraq


Rule and divide. Was the sophisticated bombing of the golden temple at Samara a set-up to turn Sunnis and Shi'ites against each other to distract from their reistance to the illegal Coalition occupation? Is the modus operandi of all this leading towards invasion of Iran, and why?

"Very concrete eyewitness testimony" that US and US-trained Iraqi National Forces were around the mosque just before the bombing, telling people to keep away. Photos showing people wiring the dome.

Former CIA analyst and presidential adviser Ray McGovern asserts that this is what is happening in Iraq.

Is the grand strategy to fragment Middle Eastern states into their ethnic and religious components to facilitate their conquest?

Good interview with Ralph Schoenman here (mp3).

Ralph Schoenman on Iraq, with some extraordinary assertions about the war's death toll ("250,000"), the reasons for the deaths of Western journalists, the bombing of the temple, British SAS forces in Muslim garb disguise, the profiteeringbehind the Dubai ports management controversy, and much more.

Listen the the end for the connection between the JFK asassination and the 9-11 fiasco. It's not your usual conspiracy nut stuff.

Thanks Almaniac Glenn Jerome for the link.

Ralph Schoenman and Mya Shone, 'Taking Aim'

Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Sunday, March 12, 2006

Evangelicals, scientists, environmentalists fight for Endangered Species Act

USA: "As the Senate prepares to take up revisions to the Endangered Species Act this month, evangelicals, scientists, environmentalists, and environmental-evangelical-scientists launched a nationwide effort to raise awareness among their supporters about the threat to the landmark law and to urge policymakers to preserve scientific protections in the act.

"The Noah Alliance, an interfaith group of Evangelical Christian, Protestant and Jews, began running about $200,000 of advertisements on hundreds of radio, print and television media since Mar. 8. Organizers hope the ads, which will run through Mar. 13, will serve to alert people of faith to the potential dismantling of the Endangered Species Act – legislation they call 'America’s modern-day ark to save God’s creatures.'

"'As Evangelical Christians in our time, we see a most profound threat to God's creation in the destruction of endangered species and their God-given habitat,' said Calvin DeWitt, environmental professor at the University of Wisconsin and president of the Academy of Evangelical Scientists and Ethicists. 'We want the public to see the risk we face if Congress weakens the Endangered Species Act.'

"The Academy, which includes nearly 70 Evangelical scholars from Baptist, Pentecostal, Reformed, and other churches and from 35 Christian colleges and universities in 19 states, is one of several faith-based groups that formed Noah’s Alliance last year specifically to bring a religious voice in the movement to protect endangered species.

"According to Suellen Lowry, Program Director for Noah Alliance, many of the Alliance members also work in other green-evangelical movements, such as the newly launched Evangelical Climate Initiative that brought together over 80 influential evangelicals for the global warming cause ..."
ChristianPost.com

Tagged: , , , ,

Autonomous village under siege by Korean troops

Click for more global actions one person can take


On March 6th, 2006, South Korean military riot police began an attack on the autonomous village of Daechuri. For over four years, Daechuri and the nearby community of Doduri have defiantly resisted the siezure of their homes and fields for the expansion of an United States Army base. Barracaded inside the elementary school, rice farmers, elderly residents, and peace activists are holding out against sporadic, sometimes intense attacks by Korea's elite military police force. International support is needed to pressure the Korean government to halt its brutal assault.

Utilizing tractors as road blocks, human shields chained to the school gates, and the courage of a people fighting for their homes and lives, they have, so far, resisted wave after wave of attacks by hundreds of military riot police. Residents and peace activists have suffered beatings and arrests, while inside the school, activists upload news updates, video of the attacks, and make pleas for immediate aid. They are exhausted and dehydrated, and in need of reinforcements and supplies. International observers, journalists, and anyone with a phone or a computer can take action now.

The expansion of U.S. Army base Camp Humphreys (K-6) is part of the Global Repositioning Plan, first outlined by the Project for a New American Century (PNAC) and later adopted as the Bush Administration's strategy for consolidating its military hegemony over Northeast Asia.

Opposition to the expansion of the base has come from many diverse currents within Korean society. Apart from community displacement, many have also highlighted issues including the devastating environmental impact of US bases, the violent crimes committed by US troops stationed on the peninsula, the issue of human trafficking and forced prostitution which surrounds the bases, and the potential for a new arms race that could destabilize all of Northeast Asia.

Future Updates: Antigizi SavePTfarmers savePTfarmers email GreenKorea.org PeaceKorea.org Peoples Tribunal Sarangbang Anarclan See Also Video [1] [2] Portland Indymedia: Story Audio

Indymedia

Tagged: , , , , ,

Saturday, March 04, 2006

When will US public opinion catch up with reality?

More Torture in Occupied Afghanistan

By Ted Rall, www.tedrall.com

"'In one of the great deceptive maneuvers in U.S. history,' Bob Herbert wrote recently, 'the military-industrial complex (with George W. Bush and Dick Cheney as chairman and C.E.O., respectively) took its eye off the real enemy in Afghanistan and launched the pointless but far more remunerative war in Iraq.' Herbert, one of the New York Times' better pundits, ought to know better than to point to Afghanistan as the right fight at the right time. But he's not the only Pollyanna of America's other dirty war.

"During his 2004 presidential primary campaign Howard Dean said: 'Our military has done an absolutely terrific job in Afghanistan, which is a war I supported...I believe that, had Saddam been captured earlier, we might have been able to spend more time looking for Osama bin Laden, which is the real problem.' John Kerry took the same position--Afghanistan war good/part of war on terror, Iraq war bad/distraction--in his run against Bush.

"And so has the citizenry. Public disgust for the Iraq War, news coverage of which has been dominated by soaring body counts, torture scandals and the outbreak of civil war, has become bipartisan--only 30 percent of Americans tell the February 27 CBS News poll that they still support it.

"The popularity of the occupation of Afghanistan, on the other hand, is a given. The U.S. military backing of Afghan president Hamid Karzai is so widely accepted that pollsters no longer ask voters about it. Opposition? There isn't any.

"Liberal magazines like The Nation and The Progressive, the Air America radio network and the leftie blogosphere are packed with ferocious insults and attacks on the Bush Administration about the Iraq War, from how they conned us into it to their lack of postwar strategic planning to the profiteering and looting that ensued. But when Afghanistan makes one of its rare appearances in the leftie media, it's invariably held up as the war Bush ought to be fighting, the good war that got sidetracked when we went into Iraq.

"Everyone loves Bush's war against Afghanistan, even though it was based on just as many lies as his assault on Iraq: Osama bin Laden probably wasn't in Afghanistan on 9/11 and was certainly not there by the time bombs began falling. People approve even though, as in Iraq, Bush didn't send enough troops--8,000 where 500,000 were required--to provide basic security. Even though Afghans didn't greet us as liberators. Even though, as in Iraq, he installed a government composed of corrupt, violent and vengeful minorities, guaranteeing sectarian bloodshed and civil war.

"And even though the news from U.S.-occupied Afghanistan--if you can find any--is as relentlessly bleak as that from Iraq. Afghanistan suffers its own litany of roadside bombs, suicide bombs, massacres of foreign aid workers, citizens terrorized by kidnappers and rapists. It even has its own Abu Ghraib.

"U.S. troops are jailing, torturing and occasionally murdering about 500 uncharged (and therefore legally innocent) inmates at a top-secret makeshift concentration camp at a disused Soviet-era machine shop at Bagram, about 40 miles south of Kabul ..."
Informationclearinghouse

Outlook worsens in Afghanistan

Afghanistan forgotten war

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Worse than Guantanamo


"Worse" Than Guantanamo: U.S. Expands Secretive Prison Inside Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan

"The U.S. is holding 500 at the base in wire cages at the Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul in Afghanistan. Some have been detained for up to three years. They have never been charged with crimes. They have no access to lawyers. They are barred from hearing the allegations against them. Officials describe the jail's conditions as primitive."
Democracy Now

Listen to Segment :: Download Show mp3 :: Watch 128k stream :: Watch 256k stream :: Read Transcript

Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

War criminal Bush not welcome in India

" ... Oh, and on March 2 Bush will be taken to visit Gandhi's memorial in Rajghat. He's by no means the only war criminal who has been invited by the Indian government to lay flowers at Rajghat. (Only recently we had the Burmese dictator General Than Shwe, no shrinking violet himself.) But when George Bush places flowers on that famous slab of highly polished stone, millions of Indians will wince. It will be as though he has poured a pint of blood on the memory of Gandhi.

"We really would prefer that he didn't.

"It is not in our power stop Bush's visit. It is in our power to protest it, and we will. The government, the police and the corporate press will do everything they can to minimise the extent of our outrage. Nothing the Happy-news Papers say can change the fact that all over India, from the biggest cities to the smallest villages, in public places and private homes, George W Bush, incumbent president of the United States of America, world nightmare incarnate, is just not welcome."
Baby Bush Go Home, by Arundhati Roy

Tagged: ,